Global Perspectives on Addressing Police Misconduct with Robocops

Clovia Hamilton
Scott J. Shackelford
Vol. 26
May 2026
Page 82

To reduce police misconduct during face-to-face interactions, minimizing such encounters is key. Integrating smart technologies like robotics into policing reform can enhance objectivity, but ethical use is crucial to prevent new forms of abuse. This study explores global perspectives of both the risks and benefits of deploying robocop technology within legal and ethical boundaries. The study proposes guidance for model protocols and regulations to address three core ethical values: responsible use, accountability, and openness. By addressing both technological potential and ethical concerns, the study aims to support the promulgation of robocop-related legal regulations that balance rapidly advancing innovation in modern law enforcement with ethics.

Keywords: AI, AI bias, AI ethics, AI robots, algorithmic bias, automated policing, autonomous vehicles, community safety, criminal justice, cybersecurity, data protection, data transparency, defunding the police, discrimination, drones, emotion detector, emotion detection technology, excessive force, facial recognition, future policing, highway patrol, killer robots, law enforcement, public safety, police, police force, police technologies, policing, police abuse, police reform, police misconduct, police patrol, police robots, policing AI, prison guards, privacy, public safety, racial bias, robocop, robot guards, robot oversight, robots, robot police, robot security, robotics, smart policing, smart justice, surveillance, technology in policing, traffic stop, use of force.

View Full Article